
J. TOMCZYK ET AL.
Figure 5.
The first left metatarsal bone of the phalange: A: two post-inflamma-
tory niches.
tempts to use PCR to demonstrate remnant DNA from either
pathogen in this case were unsuccessful. Therefore it seems less
likely that either disease was active at the time of death. How-
ever, we cannot categorically rule out poor DNA preservation
as an explanation for the negative findings in this case.
Discussion
The study of the individual reveals a complex picture. So the
discovery with the extensive pathological changes is particu-
larly interesting. The macroscopic assessment indicates that the
entire left limb and pelvis is pathologically altered, starting
from the left ilium to the phalanges of the left foot. Minor
changes can also be seen on the ribs, left scapula and clavicle.
The bones display evidence of osteoporosis, hypertrophic bone
with the osseous exostoses.
The subtle bone damage (especially on the ribs) may be as-
sociated with MTB. Palaeopathological study of MTB in hu-
man remains has been carried out for nearly 100 years (Stone,
Wilbur, Buikstra, & Roberts, 2009). But in the last two decades
a considerable progress has been made in palaeopathological
and biomolecular analysis of the disease/pathogen, indicating
that MTB prevailed since prehistory (e.g. Canci, Minozzi, &
Borgognini Tarli, 1996; Zink, Haas, Reischl, Szeimies, & Ner-
lich, 2001; Mays, Fysh, & Taylor, 2002). MTB is caused by a
group of closely related bacterial species called the M. tuber-
culosis complex. Other bacterial species are widespread in the
environment but members of the MTB complex are obligate
pathogens. The principal cause of human tuberculosis is M.
tuberculosis. In this case infection occurs via droplet infection.
Humans can also become infected by M. bovis. But it is esti-
mated that M. bovis is responsible only for about 6% of human
tuberculosis cases (Hardie & Watson, 1992; Rost, 1995). MTB
relates to people of all ages, although in most cases the ar-
chaeological material concerns, for obvious reasons, the skele-
tons of juveniles (Santos & Roberts, 2001; Ortner, 2003, 2008;
Stone, Wilbur, Buikstra, & Roberts, 2009). Our initial suspi-
cions about MTB resulted from the macroscopic inspection of
the long bones, especially of the changes in the metaphyseal
areas, and the ribs. In the first case, destruction of the osseous
structure and intensified bone neoplasial processes were ob-
served. In the ribs subtle bone damage connected with perio-
steal reaction and proliferation of new bone on visceral surface.
Moreover, our attention was riveted by the changes within the
pelvis – the compact tissue defect and the osteoporosis. Some
authors admit (e.g. Ortner, 2003) that changes in this area,
identified with MTB sacroilitis, occur more frequently in young
adults (between 20 and 30 years old) than with children, which
corresponds to the age of the individual described. Of course,
discreet bones damage which may be associated with MTB is
not described as a diagnostic criterion. However, in this case
study, no pathological changes were observed on the spine. So
we have taken advantage molecular and radiological researches
to confirm or exclude suspicion of MTB. However, our macro-
scopic observations were not confirmed—either by radiological
or molecular means.
Susceptibility to infections (bacterium, virus) and the pro-
gression of the infection is to a large extent depending on the
effectiveness of the immune system. The infections might result
in death, latent, or chronic disease. Bone tissue is affected by
infection that lasts longer than a few weeks. In our case study, it
is likely that we are dealing with an infection of bacterial origin
arising from local trauma to the ankle and/or knee regions. The
radiographic study of the tibia shows irregular lytic changes
which are observed on the proximal epiphysis. In the proximal
head of the tibial bone there are slight signs of periosteal reac-
tion, which may indicate post-traumatic change. Moreover, we
observe the osteolytic changes in the cortical layer in the fibula.
The specimen from Tell Masaikh seems to have suffered from
serious traumatic changes (e.g. open fracture) related to a sec-
ondary infection with suppurative inflammation. The infection
maybe was started in the knee region, and then infected the rest
of the left leg via the blood stream. But we cannot, however,
exclude other potential scenarios in which the infection affected
other bones from a primary location via the blood stream. As
mentioned above, we found three post-inflammatory niches in
the first metatarsal. Moreover, radiologically, there is visible
thinning of the cortical layer with complete local atrophy. This
area could be an outbreak of inflammation. The degeneration of
the osseous tissue due to osteolytic processes and its later ir-
regular reconstruction is especially well visible in the histo-
logical picture. The osseous trabeculas in this case are thinned
and their number often decreases in relation to the normal os-
seous mass. The decalcified bone tissue does not have a margin.
Our histological analysis shows Haversian canals, not so nu-
merous in the cortical part, which are enlarged. This fact indi-
cates disturbances in the distribution of the blood in the bones.
These may be the results of a secondary bacterial infection.
Conclusion
Palaeopathological research is an important element of bio-
archaeological research. Practice, however, shows that the dif-
ferential diagnosis of pathological conditions observed in ar-
chaeological material is often fraught with difficulties. This
case study demonstrates how the use of various laboratory me-
thods, together with systematic macroscopic assessment, is
essential for diagnosis of certain cases. The individual from
Tell Masaikh is a case in point—our approach led to the identi-
fication of some possible medical conditions associated with
the observed pathological changes (which are however, not
mutually exclusive): MTB and serious traumatic changes sub-
sequent to a secondary infection. Ancient DNA evidence for the
MTB complex was not detected, making this diagnosis less
likely. However, we cannot rule out poor DNA survival for this
observation. Our analysis suggests that the most probable con-
ditions which fit the distribution and the type of observed
changes are traumatic changes and associated secondary infec-
tion.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes.
36